Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MicronationKing/Empire of Smallia

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

User:MicronationKing/Empire of Smallia


A fantasy kingdom with no traceable existence anywhere except in a few wikis, YouTube, and a user website using the URL smallia.org. Not a single reliable source anywhere. The original article Kingdom of Smallia was deleted for lack of any evidence of significance, and the author subsequently twice remade it under the title MicronationKing/Empire of Smallia and each time it was deleted. Now he has created a userspace draft of a replacement. Judging by a post on my talk page, the author thinks that, provided he can create enough "sources" on various web sites and link them to his Wikipedia page, it can be kept. This is clearly not remotely suitable as a Wikipedia article. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:42, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious nonsense. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NOTWEBHOSTFORPRETENDSEALANDCOPYCATS. Achowat (talk) 20:48, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Contributor is engaged in a fantasy project, which is all well and good, but he has made repeated attempts to introduce it into Wikipedia "in universe" and failed totally to demonstrate any notability. This is just another attempt.  He would be better saving his efforts for his website and stop treating Wikipedia as a web host for part of his little fantasy.  -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 20:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Clearly on my page, no valid reason for deletion, part of my sandbox etc. MicronationKing (talk)
 * User space pages, like all pages on Wikipedia, are provided for use in connection with working on developing the encyclopaedia, in the case of sandbox pages for making preparation for editing pages relevant to the encyclopaedia. They are not provided as a private area for you to store content which is unsuitable for inclusion in articles. Wikipedia is not a free web host. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - It has been deleted multiple times, so keeping it in user space seems to fall under the WP:FAKEARTICLE provision. Maybe it should be salted to avoid further waste of time. Meters (talk) 02:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

*Note: MicronationKing removed the MfD notice from the page, but I have restored it. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:26, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

*Note: MicronationKing created another copy of this in his sandbox - I deleted it and blocked him for 24 hours, as his activities are clearly aimed at evading consensus -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

*Note: MicronationKing removed the MFD template yet again, so I have blocked for a week -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:39, 15 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete per everything above. -- Klein zach  14:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Something someone made up.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:48, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:UP requires at least some possibility of a userspace page reaching a point to where it can be included as an article in mainspace. Delete per WP:NOTMADEUP. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 06:50, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.