Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mikevensel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete all. El_C 09:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

User:Mikevensel
To paraphrase Rod Serling, "Submitted for your disapproval…"

On the theory that Wikipedia is not MySpace, the following userfied vanity articles are for "editors" clearly who ain't here for the editin', but for the publicizin'. And yes, I left messages on their Talk Pages:


 * , created 6/19
 * Total edits: 6. Edits outside user page: 1 (uploading a photo of self)
 * Last edit: June 19
 * , created 8/1
 * Total edits: 7. Edits outside user page: 5 (Five attempts to add self to List of independent circuit, non-affiliated or retired wrestlers)
 * Last edit: August 6
 * , created 8/1
 * Total edits: 2. Edits outside user page: 0
 * Last edit: August 1
 * , created 8/1/06
 * Total edits: 4. Edits outside user page: 1 (adding self to List of people by name: Thon-Thoz)
 * Last edit: August 1
 * , created 8/3/06
 * Total edits: 14. Edits outside user page: 1 (uploading a photo of self)
 * Last edit: August 4
 * , created 8/3/06
 * Total edits: 1. Edits outside user page: 0
 * Last edit: August 3
 * , created 8/4/06
 * Total edits: 1. Edits outside user page: 0
 * Last edit: August 4
 * , created 8/5/06
 * Total edits: 5. Edits outside user page: 0
 * Last edit: August 4
 * , created 8/5/06
 * Total edits: 4. Edits outside user page: 0
 * Last edit: August 5
 * , created 8/5/06
 * Total edits: 5. Edits outside user page: 2 (uploading/modifying photos of self)
 * Last edit: August 5
 * , created 8/5/06
 * Total edits: 24. Edits outside user page: 14 - 10 to the Sandbox and 4 to add self to Ben Williams
 * Last edit: October 6, to User Page. Only edit since August 5th.
 * , created 8/5/06
 * Total edits: 7. Edits outside user page: 0
 * Last edit: August 5
 * , created 8/5/06
 * Total edits: 6. Edits outside user page: 1
 * Last edit: August 6
 * , created 8/7
 * Total edits: 2. Edits outside user page: 1 (to Sandbox)
 * Last edit: August 7
 * , created 8/8/06
 * Total edits: 1. Edits outside user page: 0
 * Last edit: August 8
 * , created 8/10/06
 * Total edits: 4. Edits outside user page: 0
 * Last edit: August 10

-- Calton | Talk 04:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Baleete 'em all Danny Lilithborne 06:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. — TKD::Talk 07:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all - Wikipedia is not a free host/social networking site (and Calton, you can have the rest of the day off after that sterling performance) Yomangani talk 09:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. MER-C 10:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all. I can see how a few might qualify for wikipedia articles on their own (maybe), but this is not the way to include them. Badbilltucker 13:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep --
 * 1. Lots of other Wikipedia editors, including high-volume editors, have not too dissimilar user pages to some of these. I did not look at every onme.
 * 2. I think these should be done one at a time or else in groups of very similar user pages.
 * --A. B. 03:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) what part of "clearly who ain't here for the editin', but for the publicizin'." did you miss? What part of the listed edit counts (highest number, 24 -- 10 of which were to the Sandbox) was unclear?
 * 2) They ARE all similiar, as laid out in the nomination and chart. To recap, these:
 * a) are user pages that were moved from article space by an admin/editor.
 * b) were originally articles that were originally speedy-delete candidates or speedy-delete eligible.
 * c) have page creators who have few/no edits outside user space.
 * d) have page creators who have not edited (with one exception) since the initial page creation, a minimum of 2 months. The sole exception was one (1) edit to the user's own user page.
 * e) are, prima facie, not user pages, but attempts to use Wikipedia as a free webhost/promotional vehicle. WP:NOT, stating that Wikipedia is not a free web host is applicable.

--Calton | Talk 07:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.