Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Milad Sulh (Peace Born)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep, and mark as a user page. Armbrust The Homunculus 23:06, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

User:Milad Sulh (Peace Born)


WP:FAKEARTICLE, user has no other contribs  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 14:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Too soon. Created only recently by new user's only edit. Content is harmless, why rush to delete? jni (delete)...just not interested 16:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * It was created on the 1st, and the user has not edited since then. WP:FAKEARTICLEs are not harmless, so if the user is going to begin editing they should refactor this page. But I doubt they will; this just seems like another throwaway account made to post a fake article.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 20:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I would not call something that has few sentences about the user and explains etymology of user's name as WP:FAKEARTICLE. We would allow this level of userpage content for active editor. Too WP:BITEy to delete userpage after few weeks of account creation. jni (delete)...just not interested 09:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep and mark as user page. This does not look like an article, and seems to me well within what is allowed by WP:UPYES. Even if the user does not return to edit this will do no harm, unlike the self-promotional fake-article autobiographies we see so often. JohnCD (talk) 18:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.