Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mistaspock/Star Trek Fan Club

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Mistaspock/Star Trek Fan Club


Per WP:UP. Wikipedia isn't a host for fan pages. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  13:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 04:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

In my defense, this is not an article. This is a frivolous personal user page. One does have the right to create his own user sub-pages, does he not? I realize that would not be appropriate as a full-out article, but cannot I make my own user sub-pages? Mistaspock (talk) 16:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, but they are not to be used as a free web host, nor for playing games unrelated to Wikipedia. MER-C 13:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete User pages generally need to show some connection to building an encyclopedia. OSborn arfcontribs. 17:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.  Srolanh     See.Say. 14:00, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. We have historically allowed a limited amount of this sort of thing, akin to a sandbox or playful userpage, partly as a vehicle by which new editors can become familiar with wikicoding and the like. I wouldn't want to see Mistaspock spending too much time on this page, which might better be spent in mainspace or project space, but I don't have a problem with keeping this at the moment. In summary, deletion of Mistaspock's page would not be logical. Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Out of project scope. Somewhat harmless diversion though. jni (delete)...just not interested 18:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Please understand, the goal of this is not for a bajillion people to look up. I understand Wikipedia is not Facebook or Twitter. Personally, I do not care if no one looks at it. Please understand, many users use their pages or subpages to talk about things that they like and you have never deleted theirs. So what makes mine any different? Mistaspock (talk) 02:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * If games are not allowed than why is there a category full of Wikipedia games? Mistaspock (talk) 02:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.