Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MisterWiki/Hawaiian Wikipedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep. Aervanath (talk) 06:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

User:MisterWiki/Hawaiian Wikipedia
Copy of a redirected page (after AfD), not modified since February 2008. Violates User page. -- Fram (talk) 12:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Replace with "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hawaiian_Wikipedia&oldid=301965841" --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:12, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Use Diff Actually I am puzzled -- some Wikis of similar size have short articles, while others do not. Collect (talk) 01:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If they are demonstrably notable, they can have a separate article, just like any other website. Most relatively small Wikipedia version articles have recently been redirected to the List of Wikipedias, after some AfD's and a discussion on the relevant Wikiproject talk page (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia). Since this subpage was still categorized as a normal article, it appeared between the "true" articles and caught my attention. Fram (talk) 07:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Still puzzled -- if the article was deleted, it is not unreasonable for a person to have a copy in userspace, making this MfD moot. If the article was, in fact, just as notable as some of the remaining articles, then I am puzzled why inconsistent criteria applied. If all the the minor articles should have been deleted, then there is also no actual reason why this one in userspace is an invalid use of userspace, which does not require material to be encyclopedic or meet notability standards per se.  All that can apparently be shown is that some non-notable articles in mainspace are deletable. Collect (talk) 15:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * in anycase, it may become notable. let the article stay--it has potential DGG (talk) 00:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.