Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mliu92/sandbox/Toyota Land Cruiser (J60)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  DELETE. Amortias (T)(C) 18:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Mliu92/sandbox/Toyota Land Cruiser (J60)


Abandoned article, No objections to redirect if desired. Thanks. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The user is active today. Why didn't you contact him?  Abandoned userpages are not a problem per se, and if anything needs doing, redirection or replacing with Inactive userpage blanked should be considered before MfD.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC) And you chose to not notify him?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I hadn't checked whether he was active and as far as I knew he was notified ... If he wasn't then Twinkle obviously failed, You may want to read WP:AGF before assuming bad faith with everyone!, I've now notified him. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:58, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * What is the issue with retaining userspace draft articles? If there is an issue with search redirecting into this space then I understand but for longer articles I tend to start drafts in my sandbox before moving them into regular articles. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 15:08, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi - It usually becomes an issue when they've not been worked on for a long periods of time, In this case you'd copied the article to here in August 2016 and that was the only edit you made to it, I mean no disrespect but it shouldn't take over half a year to improve an article in a userpage, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 15:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks and no offense taken. I understand completely and if that's what's needed to clean up, then I have no issues with the deletion since there really wasn't much action on it. There's some other draft articles in there that I should revisit, then, as progress has been sporadic on many. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 15:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, If you have plans to update the article I would be more than happy to withdraw, Usually userpage drafts that haven't been edited for a long time are usually deleted but as I said if you do have plans to edit it then I'd be more than happy to withdraw, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 16:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * "Usually userpage drafts that haven't been edited for a long time are usually deleted"? No, they are not. Old userpages are usually left alone. They are deleted when there is a WP:UPNOT or WP:NOT problem. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes they are, and no they're not - They're deleted if they haven't been edited for long periods of time. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.