Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mn2010

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  moved to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Vision 2015 by. Cunard (talk) 01:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

User:Mn2010


This appears to be a promotional article and/or abandoned draft. User:Mn2010 has made no contributions to Wikipedia except to maintain this page. User:Mn2010 has not been edited in more than 2 years. Per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:STALEDRAFT this page should be deleted. Peacock (talk) 20:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * According to this search, it is a report made by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in 2008. It seems to have quite a few more sources in Google Books and Google Scholar as well. There also doesn't seem to be any article for it yet either, other than a sentence or two in a few articles. I think something could be made of this. So i'm going to Userfy it as a part of my proposed Abandoned Drafts Wikiproject, if you don't mind. I'm going to go and move it into my own userspace. Silver  seren C 01:59, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * According to the user's talk page, they tried to make the article at one point, but without any references, so it was prodded and deleted. Silver  seren C 02:01, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * It may be better using Vision 2015, the deleted articlespace version, as your starting point. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I assume it was the same as the userfied version. Either way, it was deleted for not having references, so that's what it requires as it is. Silver  seren C 11:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The content of the PRODded page and of the userpage up for deletion are the same. Nyttend (talk) 11:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * So it doesn't really matter which is used. And using the draft in this case is easier and also has an intact history (not that the deleted one wouldn't if it was restored), so it is unnecessary to go through getting an admin to undelete it if it's the same content anyways. Silver  seren C 20:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Support the move to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Vision 2015. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.