Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Modelsbymalique


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete as blatant advert. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihon joe 08:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Modelsbymalique

 * Delete: Vanity/spam/WP:NOT. Singe-purpose-account has been inactive for weeks since creating his/her own personal web space. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete- should have been prodded. Jor co ga  Hi! 01:59, Sunday, January 28 2007
 * Delete per nominator. James086 Talk  03:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Terence Ong 05:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not myspace. MER-C 07:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't read like a wikipedia article, as well as per nom --  Telly   addict  15:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Vanity. ~ Arjun  03:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom; should have been PRODed though. Greeves (talk • contribs) 23:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD G11. So tagged. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 05:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.