Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Moheen Reeyad

User:Moheen Reeyad
 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  deleted per WP:NOTBURO, user is now indef'd for abusing multiple accounts, and it's obvious what the result will be here. The Bushranger One ping only 15:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Per FAKEARTICLE, to the extent of having personal Templates (since deleted) and linking from mainspace, see WP:ANI discussion here. Black Kite (talk) 00:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GregJackP   Boomer!   00:35, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

I recently edit my user page, but what should have to done in properly in this view I feel confusion. Thanks. Moheen Reeyad (talk) 05:43, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Help needed !
 * I would say the most important thing would be for you to take part in the ANI discussion of your editing, that you have been alerted about and that Black Kite again refers to above. Here is the link again. Oh, and delete. Bishonen &#124; talk 09:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC).


 * Obvious delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 07:12, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Given that the user has been blocked for sockpuppetry, I think that the claim of 'confusion' should be taken with a pinch of salt. Not that it matters, since a fake article is a fake article, regardless of why or how it is created. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.