Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Monique.maldonado




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 04:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Monique.maldonado
per NOT:WEBHOST. This user's edits consist solely of edits to this page and an identical (or near identical) article space page since deleted as non-notable. Articles for deletion/Monique Maldonado. User page has remained as bypass to article deletion. Nothing but a self promotion quasi-article with no reference to Wikipedia. note: userpage tag added by myself Club Oranje T 10:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Entirely and excessively self-promotional and unrelated to Wikipedia. Nsk92 (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. There have been no contributions from this account other than editing this user page and the since-deleted article about the person and its talk page. In fact, there have been no contributions at all for the last three months. If the user participates in this discussion and indicates that she wants to keep this page and remain active on Wikipedia, I would change my mind, but in the absence of any response from her I would support deletion of the user page. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too promotional.  If this is intended to be a userpage description of the editor, then the editor needs to hurry up and get some edits on record.  Some explanation of the editors intentions at wikipedia would be required.  This editor needs to read WP:COI and comment on how it applies to herself.  Otherwise, this should be deleted as nothing but blatant promotion of a Nevada model.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - given that no edits to any other part of Wikipedia have been made, this editor does not appear to be here to build an encyclopaedia and so this is as ClubOranje says, a bypass to article deletion. I agree that if the editor appears and starts editing, it's a different matter.-- Beloved  Freak  18:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.