Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Monticelharmon

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete - promotional, no one finds any value in it. Wily D 07:45, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

User:Monticelharmon


Page is clearly self promotional. monticeharmon.com. Mlpearc ( powwow ) 03:17, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per obvious violation of WP:UP — Rutebega ( talk ) 18:32, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per promotion. A warning, user seems intent on keeping it here, even moving it to a subpage of their userpage. gwickwire  talk edits 21:30, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have added to this nomination the subpage copy the user has made. WP:FAKEARTICLE applies to sub-pages just as much as to the main user page. JohnCD (talk) 21:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.