Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mrt3366/File

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted WP:CSD at user's request. JohnCD (talk) 14:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

User:Mrt3366/File


Per WP:ATTACK "keeping a "list of enemies" or "list of everything bad user:XXX did" on your user space is neither constructive nor appropriate. Bear in mind that the key to resolving a dispute is not to find and list all the dirt you can find on somebody." Darkness Shines (talk) 17:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: Seems to be kept for personal record. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 18:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * And your reason for this keep within policy is? Darkness Shines (talk) 18:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Written above— "keeping record" — [end] -- Tito ☸ Dutta 18:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry Tito, but which policy is "keeping record"? Darkness Shines (talk) 18:47, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * So, now I need to explain importance of "keeping record"? See this -- Tito ☸ Dutta 18:53, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Agree with the nominator that this is not appropriate for user space. Mindy Dirt (talk) 18:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * This is a list of threads he may need to prepare report later. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 18:53, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Whether or not this is appropriate depends on the purpose of the page. WP:POLEMIC prohibits editors from keeping lists of negative information about other editors. The only exception is material which is going to be used for a dispute resolution process, in which case the material should be used promptly (this page was only created today). If the creator does plan to use this material in this manner then keep for now, otherwise delete. Hut 8.5 19:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Change to keep per the creator's comment below. If this page is to be used as part of an arbitration request or request for comment them its existence is within policy. The page can't be kept indefinitely, but it has only existed since yesterday. Hut 8.5 09:31, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


 * These records cannot be kept live indefinitely. The should be promptly feed into some WP:DR mechanism. Records can be kept offline. The issue here seems current, so deleting at MfD would be premature. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have not declared Darkness Shines as my enemy. It is the very sort of assumptions that leads me to think that Darkness Shines likes to behave pugnaciously. I am soon going to file an WP:AE or WP:RFC/U case against Darkness Shines and it was only created hours ago. I am not attacking anyone here, just preparing a strong basis for a case against Darkness Shines. But if I need to provide diffs in quick successions I need to ready them in advance. I do think depriving me of the chance or the time to do this properly is absolutely unacceptable. Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 09:06, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I will be needing those links I deposited there. Those links are indispensable to the points I wish to make in the reports. This MFD is an attempt to hinder that process. It is a clear case of COI. Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 09:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I think you're exaggerating a little. There's nothing stopping you from saving these links on your computer. Hut 8.5 12:07, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You can think that but I am not exaggerating. I don't wish to cause any disruption and I don't wish to keep them indefinitely there. I already clarified that "if I see that I cannot file a report before 13:52, June 25, 2013‎ (UTC), I will myself nominate this page under WP:U1." I am allowed to store links offline, I know and I will perhaps, but that offline process, to me, seems less efficient and more tiresome without the facilities which Wiki gives us. I don't exaggerate, kindly keep that in mind. Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 12:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep: The nominator doesn't seem to have a problem with contributing to the same type of file when it doesn't have to do with him. See his discussion on his talk page: User_talk:Darkness_Shines. Hypocritical? Crtew (talk) 22:02, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Most certainly so, Darkness Shines (talk) 22:15, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * So it seems,  Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 06:08, 20 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.