Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mungkorn

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  move and blank. Move to User:Mungkorn/Sanook and blank with inactive userpage blanked. Though I could suppress the redirect, I'll allow its creation and convert it to a soft redirect, with no prejudice against its deletion per G6 if any of the participants here think that is appropriate. (non-admin closure) —  Godsy (TALK CONT ) 11:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Mungkorn


Stale article draft, dating from Sept 2008. Slightly promotional, tho it could perhaps have been rescued ... but after this much time, this minimally-sourced draft is not a useful base to build on. The website http://www.sanook.com/ still exists, and it may be notable (I have not checked), but if anyone wants to write an article on it, they will do better to to start from scratch. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Move to User:Mungkorn/Sanook and replace contents with Inactive userpage blanked. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * That sounds fine. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I think the topic and drafted content is good enough to make it findable to someone searching all Wikipedia namespaces, and was never offensive enough (violating something at WP:NOT) to require deletion. Re-titling will make it turn up on a search for "sanook", and blanking is appropriate for old dubious (out of date?) content.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.