Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MyMoloboaccount/GamerGate

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 19:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

User:MyMoloboaccount/GamerGate

 * After having been moved through several variations of names with and without redirects, the page is currently
 * After having been moved through several variations of names with and without redirects, the page is currently

Users do not get to maintain POV Forks of live articles in their userspace. What this article represents is this user's opinion of how the Gamergate controversy (the article has undergone a title change since this fork's creation) article should be slanted. Tarc (talk) 17:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Huh? I have dozens of such subpages-these are places where I work on editing and improving article content before moving it to mainspace.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 21:49, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * We're never going to have duo articles on the same topic, therefore this draft is completely pointless. It will never become its own article, nor will it just up and replace the existing one.  Edting concerns go to Talk:Gamergate controversy. Tarc (talk) 22:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Note - User has moved the page to User:MyMoloboaccount/GamerGateDraft. Tarc (talk) 22:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah I did, in case you haven't noticed I have over dozen such pages, on which I work. Once they are satisfactory I move parts of whole pages to mainspace.This is the way I work on Wikipedia. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 22:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * My subpages. Now I would kindly ask you to stop and let me work on my edits in due time.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 22:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * To make you more happy I move it to Sandbox, some of my subpages are there already.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 22:15, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * That's great, but please stop removing the discssion tag, as that is expressly forbidden in this project. Tarc (talk) 22:19, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes because this is not an article but my user sandbox page.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 22:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note #2 - Article has again been shifted to User:MyMoloboaccount/Sandbox/GamerGate. The user has removed the MfD tag twice now. Tarc (talk) 22:19, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and sanction editor. This is a rather outrageous BLP violation. Woodroar (talk) 22:23, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * You realize this is a copy of the article that was protected for many days and I will edit it later?--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 22:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * It was a terrible version of the article, which is why it has changed so significantly. Our policies regarding BLP, attack pages, etc. apply everywhere on Wikipedia. There is no legitimate reason to keep such a page, even if you plan to go back to edit or remove violating content. Woodroar (talk) 22:36, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

I already stated that I am ok to delete this page. I am not hiding, I deleted the contents of the previous page and replaced it with another sandbox article. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 07:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC) I am not hiding, I deleted the contents of the previous sandbox page and replaced it with another sandbox article to accommodate requests to do so. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 07:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Fine:Delete if you wish. I will copy it to sandbox and work on it later. Jeez.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 22:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * You don't get it. You'e not allowed to have this anywhere on Wikipedia.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜 ) 00:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * delete most versions are improperly attributed cut and paste copryight vios from the original article page with a final cover of an improperly attributed cut and paste of a different article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  01:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note #3: as mentioned above, the article in question is at User:MyMoloboaccount/Sandbox/German-Polish relations, specifically this diff. I'm trying to AGF here, but it's interesting that the editor would try to hide the article in such a location. Woodroar (talk) 01:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and reprimand user for trying to mask/redo the sandbox after told no a couple times. While we do allow users to sandbox articles to work on them, they still must conform to BLP and this specific there's very little that a sandbox version unwatched by many will lead to problems. Trying to hide their version in an unrelated sandbox article (intentionally) is very hard to take as a good faith effort. --M ASEM (t) 03:28, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

As a show of good faith I requested speedy deletion of the page per --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 07:21, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete of course. I have already speedied some of the junk redirects by this user. jni (delete)...just not interested 15:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.