Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:My Royal Young

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: close without action kind of unanimously (the nom was more "asking whether to delete" than arguing for deletion.) (non-admin closure)  Ben · Salvidrim!   &#9993;  03:09, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

User:My Royal Young


I really don't know if this would be appropriate, but don't you guys think that he craves for attention and likes to either tag his own sockpuppet accounts or have his socks tagged? I mean, he himself made his own LTA page for whatever reason. Giving him the DENY treatment might help shut him up and deprive him of any motivation for vandalising and disrupting the project.

NOTE: This applies to all userspace pages (including talk if he himself is the page creator and/or there's nothing worthwhile to salvage or refer to):
 * Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of My Royal Young
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of My Royal Young

Blake Gripling (talk) 03:07, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Provisional Keep - Unless the proponent can explain why deleting this user page will be beneficial, my view is that the user page itself is a place to put the tags on to indicate that they are blocked, locked, banned, etc. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment simply blank useless info on a user or user talkpage. Other pages can be CSD'd or brought to MfD as required. This userpage appears to be block notices and there is no reason to blank. Legacypac (talk) 03:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: Whatever benefits tagging might have are outweighed by the attention the troll gets. Given the obvious nature of his vandalism, a simple RBI would be more feasible compared to leaving notices or perhaps outright warn the user. He clearly isn't interested in contributing positively and we should just concentrate on reverting his childish vandalism than to reason with him. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - If the vandal has any subpages, the nominator can list them. The user page itself is block notices and serves a valid purpose.  Proposing to delete the user page, far from denying, is giving them extra attention.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Close with no action. Do not bring vandal's userpages to MfD, per WP:DENY.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.