Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ncachojr/new article name here

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Ncachojr/new article name here


Obviously NN, abandoned, looks like test page. Unsourced. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * U5 or keep, blank if its a template issue bothering you. We wrote up U5 to stop these these wasting busywork nominations, if it not U5 worthy, keep, if it is then use U5 in preference to MfD coming only to MfD if the U5 is contested or declined.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:19, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is a nine-year-old test edit. We don't need nine-year-old test edits.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:50, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * We Keep userspace test edits of any age? “Need”?  Many things are not “need”ed.  Deleting everything you think is not “need”ed would destroy the project.  Jjjjdddd needs to be SLAPed for wasting our time with these nominations, not rewarded by agreeing with him.  Routine deletion of others arguably unneeded userspace edits is rude, uncollegial, and detrimental to the community of editors.  Tell him to find something useful to do, cleaning (as in throwing stuff away, not tidying) other peoples desks uninvited is not welcome in any environment. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Userspace tests are all fine and good, but we aren't a webhost. It's specifically listed as a userspace draft, not a sandbox. Userspace is *kind of* the user's, but it's not like their stuff on their desk. The "desk" belongs to the community, and the content isn't really theirs. Further, the more stuff like this we delete, the less cluttered Category:Stale userspace drafts becomes. We don't need to save every test edit, especially an ancient one. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You can remove the template, or blank, to solve the category problem. What is your alleged webhost issue here?  We don’t need to save them, we don’t don’t need to delete them.  We need nominators to understand deletion policy. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:40, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete the only way to cleanup the stale userspace cats is to clear them up Legacypac (talk) 05:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The cats can be cleared by blanking. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Until someome readds the cat. Legacypac (talk) 14:51, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Cleanup reverted is a good reason to come to MfD. Cleanup reverted hasn’t happened here. There is no hint of it every happening.  It is extremely rare.  Why do you think someone might readd the cat?  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:48, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Because "userspace draft" gets mass added to userspace pages occasionally. It would not be intentional but will happen eventually. We are here, the page is useless, just delete it already. You sound like the old horder who objects when someone picks up trash around her house "but we might need that someday... there is ofher stuff, don't bother with that yet." Legacypac (talk) 04:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. This serves no use whatsoever. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:08, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.