Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nehtefa/Portal:Imagination




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 00:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Nehtefa/Portal:Imagination
This user sandbox page seems to be an experimental copy of Portal:Computer_science, and has not been edited in about a year. I don't see the purpose of keeping this page around, and the editor last edited December 5th, 2008. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 00:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * What's the rationale for deletion? Gigs (talk) 02:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Simply put, it's not needed. It's a poor copy (test edit) of an existing portal page, and the editor has not edited in over a year.  ArcAngel (talk) (review) 19:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * UP would also apply here. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 00:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * (Speedy?) Delete Looks like a test page. Why not try g2? A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 23:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I could try that, but I haven't had much luck with speedies lately, so I felt this was the safer route (lol). ArcAngel (talk) (review) 03:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unneeded, untouched, and broken. Incidentally, I don't think g2'ing a user subpage is a good idea since sandboxen are specifically allowed.  -- Thin  boy  00  @971, i.e. 22:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a test page. User copies of portal pages don't actually work without much more effort than this, because the portal framework pulls in code from a bunch of subpages (which don't exist in the user's space). Zetawoof(&zeta;) 07:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ask the user to Delete it. If user is inactive and the page is likely to mislead someone then blank it.  WP:CSD should not normally be applied in someone elses userspace.  There is no need for editors to concern themselves with others' userspace, and users should be encouraged to maintain their own workspace.  See also WP:PERFORMANCE.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete abandoned userspace tests. This is basic housecleaning. Miami33139 (talk) 10:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.