Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Neo139/Sandbox3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was no consensus, counting the nomination (which I always regard as a comment in favour of deletion). Peter Symonds ( talk ) 13:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Neo139/Sandbox3
Outdated sandbox, untouched since 2006. User hasn't edited since November 8. Duplicate of an existing article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:36, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Nov 08 is actually reasonably recent, and you missed his appearance in March 2009. Valid use of sandbox. Collect (talk) 12:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Is three years too long to keep a sandbox? Bearian (talk) 21:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Not by any precedent if the user is still around (as evinced by his recent appearance), several cases here dealt with material more than 3 years old, and resulted in Keep.  We have enough "really really gone" cases to keep us busy. Collect (talk) 22:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Collect. -  F ASTILY  (TALK) 05:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

it's ok. Delete it--Neo139 (talk) 18:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)