Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Neon~enwiki/Herbivore

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  No consensus, keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Neon~enwiki/Herbivore


Unused userbox; for practical purposes replaceable by something like User:Kilo-Lima/Vegan or User:Xoloz/UBX/User Vegetarian. Note however, that your choice of diet has little to do with building the encyclopedia. —Keφr 08:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Quite unoffensive.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * For the sake of whom? Nobody is using it. —Keφr 08:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Userpages don't need to be used. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * This is a template. It is meant to be transcluded. That it resides in user space is a technicality. —Keφr 08:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Deleting all currently unused templates is a bad idea. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure, deleting literally every single template just because it has no transclusions is probably a bad idea indeed. But there should be a specific reason for keeping each individual template even if it is not used at the moment. No such reason exists here. —Keφr 11:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Except we need a reason to delete here, not a reason to keep. What is accomplished by "cleaning up" unused templates in other people's userspace?  They aren't really hurting anything.  Gigs (talk) 01:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:HARMLESS is not a reason to keep something either. Wikipedia is not a webhost and each page it keeps should be relevant to building the encyclopedia; pages that are not are deleted. This is why WP:CSD is a criterion, for example. —Keφr 08:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * There's the reason that random interference in other's userspace is non-collegial. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Interference in other users' userspace should be expected. As per WP:UP: "[P]ages in user space belong to the wider community. They are not a personal homepage, and do not belong to the user. They are part of Wikipedia, and exist to make collaboration among editors easier". —Keφr 08:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.