Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Neurolysis/SVGLicense

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - this closure is without comment as to the appropriateness of further usage of this page. — xaosflux  Talk 20:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Neurolysis/SVGLicense


Procedural nomination after nominated user page for deletion via TfD and the discussion was speedily closed as wrong venue. His/her concern was I don't think that a user page template is supposed to be transcluded into file description pages. P p p er y (talk) 01:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Close. This is not a forum for the policy question "I don't think that a user page template is supposed to be transcluded into file description pages".  And even if it is not supposed to be transcluded, the solution is to not transclude it, he situation does not call for deletion.  MfD is not to be used to force policy debates.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems that I did not express myself clear enough. I do not intend to change policy by this request, but I'd guess that such a policy already exists (as in all non-messy WMF projects I know).
 * Before deletion, all transclusions need to be replaced by plus SVG-Logo. --Leyo 12:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * You still do express yourself clear. You do not express a reason for deletion.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If not deleted the template might get transcluded again at a later stage. --Leyo 21:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Is that an assumption of bad faith about the seven year retired User:Neurolysis, or other editors, or are there bots that randomly transclude userpages? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * This “template” does not have a potential (appropriate) use. Hence, it may be safely deleted. --Leyo 20:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Consider editorially tagging "historic" with an explanation. But the request to delete inappropriately rests on an WP:ABF foundation. This sort of page is allowed in userspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:59, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.