Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nevela


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn for Nevela, and I prodded FluffyMuffins. Thanks for the criticism. YechielMan 05:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Nevela
Also nominating User:FluffyMuffins, a possible sock puppet. This user has some mainspace contribs, but nothing to justify the excesses of this user page. I will notify the user on her talk page. YechielMan 17:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It may be reasonable to delete extensive userpages of people who have no contributions to the encyclopedia. But I don't think it's a good idea to delete userpages because the users actual contributions aren't considered enough to justify it. -Amarkov moo! 02:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * keep. I understand the reason that we delete userpages of utterly inactive and non-contributing 'editors' but there is no Wikipedia policy stating that users must maintain any standard of activity in order to be considered an 'editor in good standing'. If the page is too long, request it be trimmed, but there's nothing here that would warrant deletion. Wintermut3 04:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.