Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nhlarry/Work-in-Progress/Cummings Research Park

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

User:Nhlarry/Work-in-Progress/Cummings Research Park

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

A mostly unreferenced user space subpage that cannot be moved to draft space due to Cummings Research Park already having an article. The content here is better than the current article, but it is ultimately unreferenced. The page was created in 2013 and the user last edited in 2019. SL93 (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: I just tagged it for speedy deletion. Sorry for my mistake. SL93 (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep . Working on articles in one's userspace is perfectly normal, and helpful for any one who wants to improve the article. This is WP:RAGPICKING. Doesn't qualify for speedy deletion either. — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 00:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It isn't ragpicking. I came across it on accident in "What links here" in an article that I was reading. I may have made a mistake, but that is no reason to assume stuff. SL93 (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that it was hasty of me to call it ragpicking, but the main point of my link there is to show my argument constructed in a better manner. — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 00:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I just get upset when false assumptions are made. I had an admin say that I have coprophilia years ago in an AfD when I wanted to keep a notable book about animal feces due to it passing WP:BOOK - so long ago that I don't remember the admin's username. An editor said I was sexist within the past year or so due to me not having the sections arranged the way they wanted in an article about a notable woman that I created - not even a content issue, but a order of when sections appeared issue (weird). I guess I can be thankful that this assumption isn't even close to those. SL93 (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, delete. I don't necessarily agree with WP:UP but I'm not going to complain. — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 23:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep WP:SK#1, no rationale for deletion. Feel free to attempt to merge, but note that "mostly unreferenced" is a problem flag.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UP per Whpq below. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:28, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UP. This is an unattributed copy of the Cummings Research Park article from 2013. -- Whpq (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It's not an exact copy, the user did add a fair bit of stuff to it. I reckon it's better just to keep it (or blank with Userpage blanked) rather than the potential hassle of deleting it and undeleting if the user comes back and wants to work on it. — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 22:44, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Userspace sandboxing is ok only for short term use, and then it should be merged back to the article, but the user. Whether used or not, the copy should be deleted, but it is an attribution-compliance hazard. Sandboxing as an editing method should be an exception for an editor dedicated to the specific task, in general, edits should be done to the article directly, all edits recorded in the history of one page. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Can you point out what the fair bit of stuff is? As best as I can tell,  it was just an addition of an infobox.  Whpq (talk) 23:27, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.