Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Niabot

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was snow keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 19:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

User:Niabot


The userpage is making blatantly misleading claims on behalf of the WikiMedia Foundation. Peacock (talk) 17:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep this is clearly a satirical criticism of the recent image referendum and not an announcement on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I see no reason to prevent people from criticising proposals in their user space. Hut 8.5 17:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I have no objection to the criticism of the Wikimedia Foundation or its policies, but this is not clearly satirical. Peacock (talk) 17:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It may not be to you, but it is to me. Hut 8.5 18:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * (ec) You should just leave my user page alone. I can't agree to your claims and you should take a look at File:Parental_Advisory_label.svg --Niabot (talk) 18:01, 13 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. jorgenev 18:21, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, the problem here is the image, not the user page. Dynamic&#124;cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 18:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Request.  is edit warring to repeatedly place the title "Invalid claim and vandalism " above the deletion tag and to hide it at the bottom of the page.  I feel this is inappropriate, prejudicial, and frankly just disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. I won't remove it myself because the user is already quite annoyed with me, but I would appreciate it if someone else would.  Peacock (talk) 18:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Didn't you start yourself with the prejustice that the file is "blatantly misleading" (something that a satire needs to be)? Where is the rule, that this message has to be on top of the page and that i can't spell out my opinion regarding this request on _my_ user page? --Niabot (talk) 18:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * You can spell out your opinion, but wp:MFD says "Enter the following text at the top of the page you are listing for deletion" (bolding not mine). Dynamic&#124;cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 18:52, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * But there is no rule that it can't be moved afterwards by the page owner. Right? --Niabot (talk) 19:03, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, if WMF implements the personal image filter against the strong will of the de-community, she'll presumably put up a little satire. --Lienhard Schulz (talk) 19:24, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Freedom of speech is no more in the english wikipedia. Liesel (talk) 19:29, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It never was... J Milburn (talk) 19:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, clearly satirical in nature. Agathoclea (talk) 19:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, you've got to be kidding... -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see no problem with userpages carrying jokes/protests of this sort. While I feel Niabot has behaved inappropriately, there's nothing wrong with the userpage. J Milburn (talk) 19:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Not everybody gotta be so narrow-minded, like the WMF-Board. WSC ® 05:26, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.