Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nick2crosby

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep - the specific complaint seems to have been addressed. Wily D 08:16, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

User:Nick2crosby


This user is indef-blocked and his user page is quite clearly WP:BOLLOCKS: his userboxes claim he lives in New Hampshire, Vermont, New York, Virginia... and China. His user page is not helping Wikipedia, let's ignore all rules and get rid of it. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Is there any precedent for deleting pages of blocked editors? There is nothing offensive about this page. -- Klein zach  15:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It is proving to be a magnet to his socks - as much as I enjoy having an easy way to identify them. Ironholds (talk) 00:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I really don't know why this should be considered to be up for deletion. I think it's kind of discriminating a Wikipedian Tom Morris. You are discriminating me because I am from China, so you want my page up for deletion. Do you see any threats? Any swears? Any inappropriate items? If so please point them out for me. Next time Please put it on my talk page before considering it deletion. The other reasons why I put those states [New York, Vermont, and Virginia] is because I used to live there. Since I deleted the 3 states, since I was born from China, and live in New Hampshire currently, now my page is up to date. Now with that said, what is my page violating? Nick2crosby (talk) 01:12, 22 January 2013 (UTC). Message me before the deletion part.
 * Keep unless a clearer argument can be made for deletion. Nick2crosby may have had problems understanding how WP works but that in itself is not a sufficient reason for deletion. -- Klein zach  01:11, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * At least blank or edit to remove the factually misleading content. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:50, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.