Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NickOrnstein (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Blank. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

User:NickOrnstein


Fails WP:NOTWEBHOST. User has been inactive elsewhere on Wikipedia for over 2 years. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 04:40, 14 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Previous Mfd decision was "keep" on the basis of "Active user working in longevity-related topics". User is clearly inactive on any part of Wikipedia other than this page. There has been no attempt to include this material into any other article. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 05:17, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - A reasonable userpage. I don't find the part in question, which is currently only a small list of the oldest living Marylanders, problematic, especially not to a level that warrants deletion. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 15:38, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would say keep if the user was also contributing elsewhere on Wikipedia, but he hasn't made any substantial edits to any other pages, two MfDs and two minor corrections aside, in years. WP:NOTHERE. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete at least the list of old people. The rest is normal userpage. Legacypac (talk) 23:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete or blank the old people list per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTHERE. The names (where possible) should be added to List of supercentenarians from the United States or list of oldest living people and not this userpage. Don't see anything wrong with the rest of the page, just the list. CommanderLinx (talk) 10:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see any problem.  Three sourced supercentenarians does not constitute a BLP problem.  Editors may retain interesting stuff like this on their userpages, and there are no time limits.  At worst, blank offending sections, but I don't find with nearly offensive in any way.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment This is not a BLP issue. This is a WP:NOTHERE, WP:NOTWEBHOST issue. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 07:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Very old people are covered in Wikipedia, List of supercentenarians from the United States for example. The content is therefore project related.  WP:NOTHERE and WP:NOTWEBHOST don't apply here.  I am someone aware of ideological battles involving, I think, "the worlds oldest people".  Is that the problem here?  In isolation, I see no problem requiring attention.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Not sure how this is project related. The user has done no editing on Wikipedia in about three years (two MFDs and two minor edits excluded) except to edit this userpage. CommanderLinx (talk) 08:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.