Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nitrogen acid




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. If this were any other page, especially an article, it would be speedily deleted as vandalism. There is no reason to keep this around. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 20:53, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Nitrogen acid
Seems like this user was only created for vandalism based on edits. If it continues, I will take it to AIV, but right now user seems dormant. -- Avic enna  sis  21:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * MfD can't do anything about this. The userpage is run-of-the-mill offensive and doesn't warrant deleting, just blank it and warn the user.  If they restore it, report them for blocking at AIV. Gigs (talk) 22:27, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah. I figured if userpages could be deleted so easily for spam, something more offensive would be doubly-so. A poor assumption on my part, it seems. (A learning experience, too.) -- Avic enna  sis  08:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Gigs has it dead-on. And "spam" is sometimes mis-used as a reason for deletion  (see WP:SPAM for what it is intended to cover in articles).  Collect (talk) 15:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete A look at the history of the userpage shows that there is no useful history. The sole content is: "Im a gay ass who masterbathes all night and i love sex." This is best deleted as run-of-the-mill juvenile vandalism. Cunard (talk) 00:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.