Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nprg/Enter your new article name here

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted. Per CSD U5. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

User:Nprg/Enter your new article name here


Blank, abandoned for eight years and the previous history contained promotional text that would be eligible for CSD G11. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:55, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G7 Author request as they blanked it Legacypac (talk) 13:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * That’s not how it works. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:20, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Leave blanked. Blanking bad ideas in userspace is recommended practice. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:20, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * That is exactly how it works. I use this CSD all the time. Why would we not use the G7 for its intended purpose?  SmokeyJoe you know your CSDs and this is mot controversial. Clearing out blank pages helps us find useful material and stuff that really needs deleting like attack and spam. Legacypac (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Read WP:CSD. Userspace, and all talk pages, are excluded from db-blank. And for good reason. Users misusing G6 to delete others’ userspace pages is obviously a clumsy attempt to get around the explicit exclusion, and is disruptive. Userspace contains many blank pages, and your reason for deleting them is pretty thin and contrary to the purpose of userspace.  Many of us archive userspace by blanking. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Never noticed that excludes userspace. Maybe that is an error. Anyrate this user has never contributed to any other page which makes this a good U5. Legacypac (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Blanking was sufficient, the nominator is wasting people’s time to bring blank pages to mfd. I would not object to U5. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.