Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nricardo/ADERANT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep--Aervanath (talk) 06:13, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

User:Nricardo/ADERANT
See rationale at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vyomnagrani/eInfochips. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 02:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as the one behind tagging all of those spam userpages. Alexius08 (talk) 07:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No, you can not say "see rationale at". Please provide examples of what's wrong with this page and how it meets the criteria. --Nricardo (talk) 10:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and ask that the overt external links be removed (as I suspect the user would do). Collect (talk) 11:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep As I said: declining db-spam and taking to MfD; I'm not sure what to do and need advice, and there's no harm in waiting 7 days because it's noindex'd in a user subpage. User:Alexius08 has been tagging a large number of pages as db-spam in user subdirectories, and I'm agreeing and deleting some, declining others, and taking some to MfD in order to get a sense of how people feel about these deletions.  Of the 4 I brought to MfD yesterday, I'd say the case for deletion is weakest on this one; I only brought this to MfD because I know that some admins would speedy this because it uses the language of marketing and the software business, and I want to see if they weigh in here, and what people think about the argument. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 20:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and just remove the overt external links if they are a problem. You can always use the talk page too. — BQZip01 —  talk 20:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep ...looks like a perfectly valid sandbox for a potential new article. 207.237.33.36 (talk) 23:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.