Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ny2292000/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  04:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

User:Ny2292000/sandbox

 * – (View MfD)

Attempting to get us to publish the editor's original research. Editor has been asking on Quora about how to sue us for deleting prior postings of this same OR. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  16:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
 * He has three mainspace edits. WP:OR is not normally a deletion reason in userspace.  I think a better explanation of the problem is required.  Why are you following the editor on Quora?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - If it had been submitted to AFC, it would have gone G13 by now. The editor is only here to web-host this original research which is pseudo-science.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per U5. Okay, what type of nonsense is this? Blatant WP:OR and lots of commentary by a user who is indulging in offwiki legal threats; I think even G3 can be applied.  Java Hurricane  12:23, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.