Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:OYCH1961/Fishing islets

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

User:OYCH1961/Fishing islets


The is intended as a POVfork of Senkaku Islands. Due to Arbcom sanctions surrounding that article, this version isn't even open for discussion, besides being ridiculously POV (it represents only 1 side of the debate). There is no current or future encyclopedic value to this page; its creator is arguably just about to reach a point of breaching the sanctions and needing a block anyway. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:48, 21 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - The nominated page was created 20:54, 18 August 2012‎, and appears to have been copied from Fishing Islands redirect without attribution. In addition, the history of Fishing Islands redirect should be deleted as well. Regarding the sanctions, Sanctions Authorization notes: any editor working on a page within the area of conflict who ... repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process is subject to sanctions that are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. "User:OYCH1961/Fishing islets" appears to be a page within the area of conflict and I don't think the edits adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia for the area of conflict as set out in Arbitration/Requests/Case/Senkaku Islands. I think an admin should take action per Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 07:47, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Just a note w.r.t. the sanctions--I have asked User:NuclearWarfare, one of the main editors acting as a neutral admin on the articles covered by the case, to look into OYCH1961's editing and consider some form of action. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.