Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ObiwanLostToBarney/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Withdrawn, creator has blanked the page  Jac 16888  Talk 14:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

User:ObiwanLostToBarney/sandbox


Sandbox being used to host a hoax or made up article already deleted at Stealth Dragons Jac 16888  Talk 21:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * My sandbox is being deleted, for hosting a "hoax". All I was doing was testing an article out, but this morning I get a message threatening to delete it. Nobody ever told me that if I tested articles in my own sandbox then it would be considered "hosting" a "made-up article". Now, you're probably gonna come up with some fancy-shmancy talk for this but I thought I could have a place where you would say, "Okay, well here's your place to -- work. Here you can do whatever the fuck you want to work for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ObiwanLostToBarney (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy Keep as a user sandbox is the perfect place to work on something like this. The editor is actively working on it, outside of mainspace, so there is no valid reason to delete it. It's very common for editors to request undeletion of a deleted article and have it placed in their userspace for working on. Since this editor is the one who originally wrote the article in question, I see no valid deletion reasons here. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 08:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.