Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Objectivist/Abortion Debate

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. Hut 8.5 17:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

User:Objectivist/Abortion Debate


Massive violation of WP:NOTFORUM by a now indef-blocked user. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 16:54, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Serves no purpose for Wikipedia; zero chance of ever potentially being useful. NYyankees51 (talk) 19:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - extensive violation of WP:NOTFORUM. Robofish (talk) 01:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: per NOTFORUM. – Lionel (talk) 08:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - seems to be a stash of old talk page and mediation discussions, which are surely already archived somewhere else.  Super Mario  Man  17:24, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If you look at the page's history, you'll see that except for the MfD nomination, the only edits to it are by User:Objectivist. He did copy bits of conversation with/between others from various other pages, and then added a giant monologue of his own towards the end. Pretty misleading. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not outrageously inappropriate, with some relvance to content and arbitration, but it goes well beyond note gathering in support of article improvement.  On balance, it is not sufficiently related to the project.  User:Objectivist could keep it off-site.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.