Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ollie Locke

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

User:Ollie Locke


People looking for a biography on Locke may come across this and think this is it. It is full of original research and as there is now an article on the man - see Ollie Locke - this should be binned. Laun chba  ller  08:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:STALEDRAFT and WP:FAKEARTICLE. The user has no other contributions. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 21:59, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That's the policy I was thinking of.-- Laun  chba  ller  22:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per above, as stale/unsourced info.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:35, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.