Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Onetwothreeip/Frank Salter

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Salvio 21:21, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

User:Onetwothreeip/Frank Salter

 * – (View MfD)

WP:STALEDRAFT suffers from the same problems outlined at Articles for deletion/Frank Salter where it was deleted. This has no potential for any usable content. jps (talk) 16:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is the deleted Frank Salter article which was userfied by per this discussion. Onetwothreeip was warned at the time (April 2019) that it can't be kept in userspace indefinitely and that they should make an offline copy if they'd like to save it. –dlthewave ☎ 17:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Actually, I'm not sure why it was userfied - we shouldn't have such poorly sourced negative BLPs in user space at all. StAnselm (talk) 17:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Not yet. I'd like to see if any contributors to Australian political articles could use this content before being deleted. Onetwothreeip (talk) 00:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * You had almost a year and a half to do this. It's time to get rid of it. jps (talk) 03:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment See also Articles for deletion/On Genetic Interests. jps (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - userpages are not meant to hold deleted content forever. There has been ample opportunity to use this material and "see if any contributors to Australian political articles could use this content". -- Whpq (talk) 20:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Probably qualifies for G10, but we are here. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per clear consensus at Articles for deletion/Frank Salter. Fails WP:BLP.  I note that the three sources are not suitable sources.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:22, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete On the edge of a G10 speedy, this is poorly sourced negative or controversial content about a living person. It is in userspace and so is NOINDEX'd but WP:BLP still applies. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:52, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Borderline G10 that was already deleted once at AfD. The creator has had over a year and a half to look for sources and/or merge candidates, this needs to be cleared out under WP:STALEDRAFT at this point. Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.