Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ood/Eggs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 16:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Ood/Eggs
The contents of this page is 528 level two section headings, all saying EGG. J Ditalk 23:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I would have asked Ood about this, myself. It looks like an abandoned test page, and if asked he would probably either consent to its deletion (allowing it to be speedied rather than MfDed) or explain that he had some further use for it. Xaosflux has posted a message on User talk:Ood, but the account is a relatively infrequent contributor, so I'm going to say delete unless Ood says he wants it for something. --Sam Blanning(talk) 00:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm going to contradict myself and say BJAODN and keep, both...I think it's a test page, which we can just leave to Ood's discretion, but this kind of randomness deserves to be seen. --  stillnotelf   is invisible  01:28, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless user rely rely want to keep it. Whatever the case for the love of God don't BJAODN! BJAODN was supposed to be about preserving clever humorous prose that was not ensyclopedic enough to stay in articles, not collecting every random "odd" thing you find. The whole thing have jumped the shark if you ask me. --Sherool (talk) 05:59, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with the same previsos as above. 528? You counted them? Yomangani talk 00:09, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Tables of contents are numbered, at least on my skin. --Sam Blanning(talk) 15:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, you could've just blanked it and informed the user instead of bringing it here.-- Andeh 10:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Per above. Daniel's page    ☎  03:34, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and for fuck's sake don't spam BJAODN with this waste of space. &mdash; Werdna talk criticism 07:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.