Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:OpenMind/Li Shao'an

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  speedy delete all three under CSD G6. In the case the author wants the pages undeleted, they can be requested at Requests for undeletion without need for a full deletion review (or he/she can simply recreate them). Tito xd (?!?) 08:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

User:OpenMind/Li Shao'an


Blank drafts from 2011 that do not meet strict criteria for G6 as user is occasionally active. Legacypac (talk) 15:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) User:OpenMind/Liu Wanchuan
 * 2) User:OpenMind/Ma Gui Style Baguazhang
 * Keep - User made productive edits on 14 December 2015, no need to delete a completely non-problematic page from an active and constructive user. I would suggest asking to user to U1 them if they don't need them anymore. Also, on a procedural point, why was one of the pages in this nom already deleted? can restore the page pending the outcome of this deletion discussion? A2soup (talk) 16:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I deleted the first in the list because had applied db-blankdraft to it. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * RHaworth, you "deleted" it? When?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * In the deletion log, you can see User:OpenMind/Li Shao'an was briefly deleted before being restored after the exchange above. A2soup (talk) 04:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete all three. Legacypac, please do not waste our time with pointless requests like this. All three are empty pages. It would only take Li Shao'an a moment to re-create any of them. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete all per RHaworth. Whether we call it a test edit or blank draft, it's eligible for speedy. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 18:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Close reverted because factually wrong. The pages were not deleted, and still are not.  Very odd.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Well I could hardly CSD it under "Author requests deletion" could I ?, I closed it as I did actually expect them to be deleted so thought keeping them open was a waste of time .... – Davey 2010 Talk 00:03, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * With both you and RHaworth making apparently incorrect past tense statements, it is very confusing. My best guess was a partial database reset. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as basically nothing here, entirely acceptable as housecleaning. SwisterTwister   talk  07:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.