Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Orson20/Leon Ousby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete as we're either doing what everybody wants or simply undo a userfication that has not resulted in an encyclopedic artcile. Tikiwont (talk) 08:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Orson20/Leon Ousby
This is the remnants of a userified article twice deleted at AFD (once as not notable and the second time as a partial hoax). The author has indicated on the page that the article's subject wishes it to be deleted. Looking through the page history, it appears that the author is either the subject of article or someone known to them. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment why not G7 it? Author who may also be subject requests deletion of article in user space. TravellingCari  04:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I would, but I'm practising assuming good faith. I really need the practise. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Gotcha, in that case I'll leave it be and just support deletion per the reasons you mentioned and per G7 TravellingCari  14:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm a little confused here. At first I thought Leon Ousby was requesting deletion vi92.40.212.254 (talk) 20:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)a an IP, but it would seen that the IP is Orson20. and  made the request, while  and  have made contributing edits that appear to be Orson20, mixed in with other edits from Orson20 while logged in. So it would seem that this is Orson20, and thus a speedy-able deletion. If he could log-in and make this request, it would save some time. -- Ned Scott 01:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Or, maybe Orson20 feels that blanking it is the deletion, and the message left behind is an explanation for the removed content? -- Ned Scott 01:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This IP address is Orson20. Leon Ousby wishes the page to be deleted. The blanking of the page was me removing it and yes the message is an explanation of why. It appears I crossed boundries of privacy. I apologise if I have caused offence. The article went a little way off track from how I indended it to read. I received an email requesting it to be edited or removed from T.J Management LONDON which is the company the represents Leon Ousby. I am still considering editing, but at this stage I would prefer it to be deleted. Once again I apologise if I have offended any people/person mentioned in the Article. Orson Griffiths
 * Delete per the above. -- Suntag  ☼  10:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete If the subject's management service has requested deletion because the article violates privacy then it is advisable it is removed even if it is in userspace.Apron Maxim (talk) 07:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)