Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PÆonU/ELSandbox




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedy Delete per WP:CSD. (non-admin closure) A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 04:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

User:PÆonU/ELSandbox
Userspace copy of an article deleted as a BLP1E violation - no efforts to demonstrate continued notability of this individual - article exists mainly as attack page. --Hipocrite (talk) 14:26, 19 November 2009 (UTC) *Delete per Tan. WP:UP forbids this sort of thing. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC) This was an error on my part; I did not realize Tan userfied the article without the user's knowledge. Apologies. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. As the original deleting admin, I agree there has been no effort to improve this article. Quoting content guideline WP:UP: "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia. In other words, Wikipedia is not a free web host. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Tan   &#124;   39  14:31, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Firstly, this seems to be a clear BLP1E violation, as well as against COPIES as quotes by Tan. If in the future, this young... erm... lady... becomes notable for more than this one incident, there might be a place in the encyclopedia for her - but if that should happen, it won't be for a very long time, and there's no sense in keeping a previously deleted article, even in user space. --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 17:55, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * On the contrary, I did userfy based on user request. The question below was sarcastic; he wonders why I userfied it and then !voted to delete it some time later when it has not been improved. Tan   &#124;   39  03:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Tan, why did you userfy it for me? I didn't have time to work on it, as I came down with swine flu, but am starting to soon. If I wanted to preserve it I would save the page, not take up webspace. PÆonU (talk) 22:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Additional Comment If you look at my recent edits, you'll see that I asked users who voted to keep the article to help out on their talk pages. I have good intentions to fix this article. If it is indeed beyond repair I will delete it. PÆonU (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I userfied it so you could work on it. You never worked on it, for whatever reason. This is all clear in the discussion above. Tan   &#124;   39  22:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I copied the article to a text file. Lambert is now making a ruckus that if she was a male it wouldn't have been a problem and that the attacks were retaliatory. If I know my media, in the next few weeks there will be a huge debate over this. This article, even though I am no longer sick, will take time to improve. Since patience doesn't seem to exist on this website, delete the sandbox so I can work on this in Word as the news comes. PÆonU (talk) 22:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Per your delete vote here, I've tagged the page for speedy deletion per WP:CSD. I also struck my delete vote above. Apologies for the misunderstanding. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Final Comment I should let you know, we have now learned that the attacks were all provoked. The punch in the back was because of an elbow to the chest and the hair-pulling was because of a crotch grab. This is no longer defamatory. Since this is definitely going to be deleted (there are no keep votes), I am going to edit the article in Word. You people should research something, like the educated do, before criticizing it. If any of you wish to help edit the page, as it is no longer defamatory to write about her, I'll gladly accept the help. I've only done small to medium size edits during my time here; never have I completely written an article. So any advice or assistance would be great. PÆonU (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/10/crimesider/entry5601480.shtml
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.