Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PCHS-NJROTC/MiddleEastBlock

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  speedily deleted pursuant to CSD U1. Non-admin closure. Safiel (talk) 20:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

User:PCHS-NJROTC/MiddleEastBlock


I am nominating this with the proviso that I am neutral as to whether this should be deleted or not. However, somebody has previously objected to this user page "joke", first via PROD and second via CSD G10, both of which I have declined. I personally don't see any problem with it, but I will run it by the community, to see if others may or may not find it objectionable. Again, I am neutral in regards to this page. Safiel (talk) 04:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:NOTCENSORED. This is making fun of School block. It's meant to be mildly offensive, but to make a point, in a mildly humorous way. My feelings wouldn't be hurt if it went away, but I think it should stay. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages)Schoolblocks are like gun-control, they only stop good faith contributors. 04:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep until the school block discussion is over, then maybe Weak delete or something (no skin off my nose) - PCHS-NJROTC made a good faith parody of the school block template (not saying whether or not I agree or disagree, just that I can see which station his train of thought left, what track it is on, and what station it is heading to whether or not I'm on that train or a different one). We cannot argue that PCHS-NJROTC is somehow not allowed to make this argument, though I could see how someone might feel that he shouldn't make this argument in this particular way (based on WP:POINT, though the closest I've seen to disruption is a couple of people who don't seem to get the joke).  Still, the only reason to keep it around is for that specific discussion.  While I see no reason to believe that PCHS-NJROTC would even think to abuse the template (especially since he is using the idea to protest something he feels is wrong), I do know that there are some trolls, vandals, and (to be frank) totally batshit nutters out there who might use this inappropriately.  After the discussion is over (whatever its results), most of the editors who find it will do so out of its original context and even the good-faith majority of those people could very easily misinterpret it one way or another.  I dunno if that's necessarily worth another MfD, but if it was my page, I'd consider db-self'ing it when the discussion was over (just to avoid any trouble).  Ian.thomson (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I know this is meant to be humorous, but it is also WP:POLEMICal and WP:POINTy. Deletion is recommended, and PCHS should ask themselves whether this is appropriate behavior.  --Jules (Mrjulesd) 13:55, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per U1. The point isn't worth the shitstorm, and apparently some people can't understand that this is deliberately supposed to be ridiculous. No disruption intended. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages)Schoolblocks are like gun-control, they only stop good faith contributors. 17:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep but tag with humor. clpo13(talk) 20:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep After some thought, I don't see any violation of Wikipedia policies with this humorous template. I will change from neutral to keep, mainly for the record, given the comment of the page creator. Safiel (talk) 21:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.