Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PSALAW/PSALAW

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. — ξ xplicit  01:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

User:PSALAW/PSALAW


Pretty spammy article about a law firm. No attempt made to provide evidence of notability. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:18, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments - It's only been two months since the last edit. Not sure that rises to the "indefinite" term in WP:STALEDRAFT: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content." The content was moved from the User's main page, and the User's main page was deleted. How long did this content reside on the user's main page without change? -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 22:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Inquiry - we should reserve judgment until an admin answers Uzma Gamal's question. Achowat (talk) 15:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam with no chance of being an article, IMO it would qualify for speedy G11: "thorough knowledge of the unique rules... highly qualified local attorneys... vast trial experience... its lawyers' outstanding qualities... proven track records as remarkable attorneys... " etc. To answer Uzma Gamal, it was created as User:PSALAW on 23 April as the first and only edit of user, blocked a month later as an obvious role account for Phillips, Spallas & Angstadt, LLP. Another of the many new users who think Wikipedia is another Myspace, so that the thing to do is set up a company account and copy to its user page the sort of promotional fluff they would put on their website. JohnCD (talk) 21:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete works for me, either as G11 or as WP:FAKEARTICLE. Achowat (talk) 13:04, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.