Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pakalomattam/joel osteen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep with a userpage tag up top. It is possible that the page is indeed a sandbox, so I have notified Talk:Joel Osteen in case they want to merge anything. &mdash;harej (talk) (cool!) 05:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC) Closing instructions

User:Pakalomattam/joel osteen
Abandoned userspace draft; user has not edited this page in over a year and has not edited at all in over six months. Stifle (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - per no good reason given for deletion. –xenotalk 15:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Uh... what part of the reason is bad? The page has been abandoned and is an external linkfarm. It's also being used as a free webhost. Stifle (talk) 15:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Page appears to have been used as a sandbox for the mainspace article of the same name. What's to say the contributor won't return? NOINDEX seems to be a better way to deal with it if there are other concerns. –xenotalk 15:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge anything worth keeping with the main Joel Osteen article then replace with .--Otterathome (talk) 21:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Blank. User can unblank if he wants to work some more on it.  No point fussing with the unreliable NOINDEX for something that no one has a reason to look at.  No need to delete, it doesn't hurt by exisitng in accessible history.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.