Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pandlakalyan/Pandlakalyan

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 15:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Pandlakalyan/Pandlakalyan


Year old draft consisting of nothing more than a link to a facebook page. Editor's only other edits were to post the same facebook page and a twitter link as well. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I think links to facebook are prima facie evidence of promotion, and if that's all it is then G11 applies.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete' - I wouldn't say this was promotion as such as they're not actually trying to promote themselves as such, Anyway it's not rocket science to add a link on your userpage as there's no actual content it's better off daleeeted. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 08:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.