Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PaolodiprimaWiki/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ‑Scottywong | [speak] || 06:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

User:PaolodiprimaWiki/sandbox

 * – (View MfD)

Full on advert that fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Recommendations by previous reviewers were ignored and its pretty clear the page creator has no intention to try to right the ship. Page would have to be wholly re-written to have even a chance at approval out of AfC. G11 may be more appropriate by I'm going to go with the recommendation of Robert McClenon and let this be sorted in MfD Sulfurboy (talk) 18:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is a reasonable candidate for G11, but I prefer to be cautious in the use of G11 and to send doubtful cases to MFD. In this case, the submitter chose to ignore the comments by User:KylieTastic and by me not to resubmit.  (Well, maybe they are only here to advance their career.)  "Don't say we didn't warn you."  A block would be an alternative, but this is a content forum.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.