Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Paperwheel/Userbox gallery

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete all  — fetch  ·  comms   02:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

User:Paperwheel/Userbox gallery
I am nominating a list of subpages listed here Special:PrefixIndex/User:Paperwheel/. This account has only ever edited live articles twice and appears to have spent the greater part of 1.3 years creating subpages and adding userboxes and bits and pieces of junk to them. Account stopped editing over a year ago. As they apparently have no intention of actually editing here, these pages serve no purpose and are an inappropriate use of the Wiki. Burpelson AFB (talk) 02:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 02:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all subpages as user was clearly not here to contribute. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all - I don't see any bad faith here, but keeping around a collection of this kind of stuff is against policy. EdJohnston (talk) 03:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all per above. MER-C 08:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all The user is not here to contribute to Wikipedia, and seems to be creating/maintaining these pages for use elsewhere. This violates WP:NOTWEBHOST.  Peacock (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. It looks to me like the editor has used his user space as a series of bookmarks and to-do lists; articles to create or review, Wikipedia policies to refer to.  He may have not followed up on much of this, but I don't see the harm.  I don't think we're into WP:NOTMYSPACE territory here; he just didn't follow through on his plans.  If the editor had a more recent edit history, my !vote would be a straight Keep on the premise that we'd be interfering with his organization of work; it's only weak because, he may never come back, so may not be harmed by the deletion. TJRC (talk) 22:16, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There are other users/projects organizing userboxes too, but since this user is inactive and hasn't really organized much, I'd agree with TJRC that deleting this won't do any harm. Netalarm talk 04:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom et al. Matt Deres (talk) 21:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.