Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Partysmores999/The Ninja Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was no consensus. &mdash;harej (talk) (cool!) 00:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Partysmores999/The Ninja Club
Wikipedia doesn't need a "ninja club" of Wikipedia "protectors", especially from a self-described "master/sensei" with a penchant for creating fake articles about speculative future seasons of TV shows. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 22:12, 14 July 2009 (UTC) We need it -Partysmores99
 * Blergh. Delete, obviously. The CVU is bad enough, we don't need more ul17r4 1337 anti-vandalism silliness. → ROUX   ₪  23:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * For what? → ROUX   ₪  00:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Come on, we need to get less people spamming and more people removing the stuff people do. I don't find it fair that some user put a while back that Katie, Sadie, Cody, Eva, and Tyler were returning to TDA and I can't put that Noah's returning? -Partysmores999
 * And how does this do that, exactly? Your project isn't going to attract more people. If removing "stuff" is your goal, why not actually do that instead of wasting your time creating super secret sparkly unicorn ninja vampire club which is completely redundant, since we already have a counter-vandalism unit. Ironholds (talk) 11:31, 17 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Visitor books, secret pages, and other play things are good for learning, community building, and community spirit, as long as they are kept incidental to the participants serious contributions.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete userspace is indexed on google. This is not the sort of stuff we want to be presenting to the world. Gigs (talk) 14:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. After a long look through User page, I can't find anything this page is violating. There's nothing on the page that is divisive (at least, unless somebody's Pirate Club comes along to object :) ) or belittling of other editors. The page appears to be secondary and and adjunct to editing Wikipedia; Partysmores999 isn't here just to run his club. —C.Fred (talk) 22:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * With edits like this, I don't think it's much of an "anti-vandalism" club. Gigs (talk) 14:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Its not going to do any harm. Why don't we just leave it alone? If it gets out of hand, that's when we delete it. Programmer13TalkWhat I do 13:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. A complete waste of time that is already superseded by the WP:CVU Ironholds (talk) 11:31, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.