Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Patrash Hembrom/sandbox/Lucash Hembrom

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Agreed that these should be blanked rather than bringing them to MfD, but since it's here and unlikely to ever be improved on (given that the user is blocked). &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 15:16, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

User:Patrash Hembrom/sandbox/Lucash Hembrom


Old, unsuitable draft by a user that was blocked. Draft is not eligible for G13 since AFC submission template is absent, delete per WP:STALEDRAFT. Obvious connection with User:Heman Hembrom/sandbox/Patrash Hembrom. Sam Sailor 11:00, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 *  Delete Blank - biography of non-notable individual. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:17, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Blank - It's a sandbox. As the quoted guideline above says (WP:STALEDRAFT), seek deletion if it's problematic even if blanked. I'm not seeing that it would be problematic if blanked. People write about goofy, even autobiographical things in sandboxes when learning about Wikipedia, and we don't apply notability to them just like we don't to a regular userpage that contains even a lot more autobiographical detail. Reason for blanking rather than keeping is because the user is blocked. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 14:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Blank and apply inactive userpage blanked per WP:STALEDRAFT - If of no potential and problematic even if blanked, seek deletion. No problem if blanked. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 16:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Blank. Bringing every harmless worthless old user subpage to MfD would be an absurdity. There is nothing special about this example, no reason not to merely blank it as a complete solution for its problems.  Please boldly blank pages like this on discovery, old not suitable long inactive author, any editor can fix, sofixit. Does not require a formal meeting. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete it is a named page with the word sandbox in the naming string. Not a sandbox, a UP#COPY or abandoned draft. Legacypac (talk) 16:14, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete now that we are here, but pages like this should be blanked without the fuss and ceremony, without this burst of attention. They are non notable family stories. They belong on Facebook or similar. BLP applies, but there are no serious issues, and if there were take it to WP:Oversight, not to a public forum page. -SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:20, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * For clarity, could you strike your other !vote and/or combine them? &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 23:23, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.