Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Patrick E. Cooley




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep as a perfectly normal userpage. Beeblebrox (talk) 09:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Patrick E. Cooley
Delete per WP:UP and WP:NOTWEBHOST. User has no edits outside his own user page and the sandbox, and has been inactive since 2008. Psychonaut (talk) 11:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep All it is, is a few userboxes and a statement that he was born in 1972. I fail to see how either reason above applies.  Yes, he has been gone for a year.  Should we make "wikiabsence" per se a reason for deletion? That is a matter for discussion on the MfD talk page - but I did not find it used before as the sole reason.  Collect (talk) 13:13, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Absence from the wiki is not alone a reason for deletion. Making the entirety of your edits to your own user page has, historically, been sufficient reason for deletion. —Psychonaut (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Blank, and patiently wait for this user to begin making constructive edits. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm not seeing a reason for deletion or even to blank. Userpages are allowed to list likes and dislikes in the form of userboxes. While users with contributions outside userspace are given more leeway on their userpage, I don't see this page as the user using Wikipedia as a webhost. Galatee (talk) 03:54, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.