Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Patrickjdwise

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Courcelles 11:49, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Patrickjdwise
Copy in user space of the article Nip/Tuck, untouched since December 2009. Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. JohnCD (talk) 21:37, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This does not look useful, but it would be good to get input from Patrickjdwise to see what is going on, and why the original artical cannot be updated in place. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, unless something comes out of what Graeme said.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 22:29, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. The user has not edited since December 2009, so it is highly unlikely anything will come of Graeme's consultation. MER-C 06:14, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.