Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Paul David Wilson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep. Users last edit was 29 January 2009 and they were not not notifed that the page was up for deletion, although that is not a requirment, and they may not be aware of the discussion. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 12:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Paul David Wilson
I first became aware of this page when User:Paul David Wilson made a request at WP:CHU to have a username change because he didn't want the "USER" at the front of his name. When I looked at his page, I realized that it was really an article on Paul David Wilson and that he was probably requesting a page move, to which I asked him if that was what he wanted, but also advised him that the article didn't meet the current requirements for inclusion on WP. While there are claims to notability, none of them are substantiated. None of the links he provides establishes Mr Wilson of notabilty. Most don't even mention him. Those that do mention him are not reliable sources. I told him on Feb 9 what he needs to do to keep this page, and after a week he has made no effort to establish the user as viable per our policies/guidelines.--- I'm Spartacus!  The artist formerly known as Balloonman 21:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Pauldavidwilson edited as late as 14 Feb, which is actually under a week, and was active after your post to him on 9 Feb. As a user page, notability is not an issue, and at this point should be considered as a "work in process" not subject to one week ultimatums.  Last I checked, RS and the like apply to actual mainspace articles, making that part moot.  The other potential reason for deletion would be "excessive c.v." but that was not raised. Collect (talk) 12:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.