Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Paul Palumbo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was '''Withdrawn by nom. NAC.'''. roux   00:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Paul Palumbo
User has not edited since 18 January 2007, and only two article edits for this user.  The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 23:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * So? Not a reason to delete. Speedy Keep, suggest withdrawal or speedy close to this. // roux   00:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Per this: "If a user page was deleted because a contributor left, it may be restored by an administrator if the contributor returns, particularly if the history contains evidence of policy violations." So if the user returns, then he can ask an admin to restore his userpage.  Therefore my answer is I will leave this listed here. -- The New   Mikemoral  ♪♫ 00:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * And what policy violations are there? What pressing need is being served by deleting this page? // roux   00:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. I agree with you. I suggest a withdraw per roux. -- The New   Mikemoral  ♪♫ 00:24, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.